Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for GIGTYME, serial 87455566, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
GIGTYMESerial 87455566 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Gigtyme, Inc.
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed May 18, 2017
The record shows that “GIGTYME” is an abandoned service mark – the USPTO listed it as dead after the applicant failed to file a required Statement of Use, with the abandonment notice issued on June 22 2020; the owner is Gigtyme, Inc., a Delaware corporation. The registration covered only class 042 services, specifically a website and software‑as‑a‑service that let users hire employees and contractors for the event and production industry. Because the claim is limited to that technology‑focused hiring platform, a similar name used for unrelated goods or services would be a farther concern, but a competing SaaS hiring tool in the same industry would be the closest record‑based overlap. The mark was never placed on the Supplemental Register, so the prosecution history simply reflects the usual extensions of time for a Statement of Use that ultimately were not satisfied. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment entry on June 22 2020, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan a comparable hiring‑software brand in the event‑production space.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.