Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PAPERAZZI MAGAZINE, serial 87460243, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PAPERAZZI MAGAZINESerial 87460243 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: PAPER MAGAZINE (PRIVATE) LIMITED
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed May 23, 2017
Registered Jan 09, 2018
The record shows that “PAPERAZZI MAGAZINE” is a cancelled Principal Register service mark, with the cancellation entered on July 22 2024 because the registrant failed to file a required Section 8 declaration; the owner listed is PAPER MAGAZINE (PRIVATE) LIMITED, a private limited company organized in Pakistan. The registration covered Class 041 services – specifically an online magazine and website portal providing entertainment, fashion and lifestyle news, current‑event reporting and commentary via the Internet, with a stated first use of February 1 2015. A similar name used for any online publication or website that offers comparable entertainment‑related content would be the closest record‑based concern, because the goods and services are narrowly defined to that digital magazine space. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “paperazzi” or “magazine” outside those described services. No Supplemental Register filing appears, and the prosecution history shows only the usual examination steps and the final Section 8 cancellation; there are no oppositions, cancellations or court actions noted, so the supplied history shows no enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a digital entertainment‑news brand with a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.