Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for RECETAS ORIGINALES ANTONIO RODILLA DESDE 1939 ELABORACION ARTESANA, serial 87471114, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
RECETAS ORIGINALES ANTONIO RODILLA DESDE 1939 ELABORACION ARTESANASerial 87471114 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Rodilla Sánchez, S.L.
Class 029 - Meats & Processed Foods
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Class 043 - Restaurant & Hotel Services
Filed Jun 01, 2017
The record shows the mark RECETAS ORIGINALES ANTONIO RODILLA DESDE 1939 ELABORACION ARTESANA is abandoned, with the last status entry on Feb 8 2021 noting that no Statement of Use was filed after the Notice of Allowance, so the application was cancelled; the owner listed is Rodilla Sánchez, S.L., a Spanish limited‑liability company. The filing covered Class 029 (fruit, potato, vegetable and garden salads), Class 030 (prepared macaroni, pasta and rice salads, coffee, tea, cocoa, chocolate‑based drinks and flavoring syrups, various chocolates and candies) and Class 043 (restaurant, bar and coffee‑shop services). A similar name used for food, beverage or hospitality offerings would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside those categories would be farther from the scope shown. Because the mark was never entered on the Supplemental Register, there is no supplemental‑register sequence to note. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice on Feb 8 2021, and the supplied history contains no opposition, cancellation or court actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a comparable name in the same food‑service space, but it does not block every possible use of the wording.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.