Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for BABSON, serial 87562987, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
BABSONSerial 87562987 · Supplemental Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Shenzhen Basen Industry Co., Ltd.
Class 002 -
Filed Aug 09, 2017
The record shows that the “BABSON” application is dead – it was abandoned on February 17 2019 after the applicant failed to give a complete response to the Office’s final refusal, and the owner listed is Shenzhen Basen Industry Co., Ltd., a limited company organized in China. The only goods covered are a range of inks – edible inks, engraving ink, ink for leather, skin‑dressing ink, marking ink for animals, mimeographing ink, planographic ink and typographic ink – all in International Class 2, so a similar name used for any of those ink products would be the closest record‑based concern. Because the mark sits on the Supplemental Register, the prosecution history shows a final refusal followed by an abandonment rather than a successful amendment to the Principal Register; this indicates the USPTO did not find the mark registrable for the listed goods. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice mailed on February 19 2019, and the supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations or court actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use “BABSON” for ink‑related products, but it does not extend to unrelated goods or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.