Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for IMA, serial 87597927, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
IMASerial 87597927 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: IMA SCHELLING DEUTSCHLAND GMBH
Class 007 -
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Sep 06, 2017
Registered Jun 18, 2019
The record shows that the mark “IMA” is live and registered on the Principal Register under serial 87597927, owned by IMA SCHELLING DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, a German limited liability company. The goods covered are extensive woodworking machines and related equipment (class 007), electronic control systems for such machines (class 009), and engineering and software services for woodworking machinery (class 042). A similar name used in any of these areas would raise the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the mark control over every use of the word “IMA”; it applies only to the specific goods and services listed. The prosecution history shows a normal sequence of acceptance, publication, and registration with no Supplemental Register involvement. The latest maintenance event was the acceptance of a Section 8 and 15 declaration on September 23, 2025, and the next significant date is the status date of September 23, 2025. No opposition, cancellation, or court action appears in the supplied history. For someone looking to use a similar name, the presence of this active registration in the same technical field suggests a meaningful risk of conflict.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.