Status report

Get it in writing

The official USPTO status record for RAY BAN TAI, serial 87607875, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.

INSTANT DELIVERY

Trademark Status Report

$7.99

The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.

  • Current status with a plain-English verdict
  • Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
  • The mark as it appears on the federal record
  • Every prosecution event, filing to today
  • Source-cited with the exact retrieval date

Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.

Payments launch soon. Leave your email and we'll tell you when this report is available.

Searching stays free, no account, no caps.

Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
RAY BAN TAI
Serial 87607875 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused

Owner: Putian Changli Industry & Trade Co., Ltd
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed Sep 14, 2017

The record shows that the application for RAY BAN TAI (Serial 87607875) was abandoned on July 20, 2018 after the applicant failed to answer an Office action, so the mark is not live or registered; the owner listed is Putian Changli Industry & Trade Co., Ltd, a limited company organized in China. The filing covered Class 009 goods described as “3D spectacles; calculators; electrostatic copying machines; eyeglass chains and cords; graduated glassware; scales; spectacle cases; spectacle lenses; spectacles; sunglasses,” so a similar name used on any of those types of electrical or scientific apparatus would raise the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Ray Ban Tai” in other product categories. Because the application was on the Principal Register and never moved to the Supplemental Register, there is no supplemental‑register sequence to note. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice mailed on July 20, 2018, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan to brand similar optical or electronic products under a comparable name.

Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.

The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.

Your name deserves a straight answer.

Search the federal register free. No account, no caps, no waiting around.

Run a free trademark search