Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for I'M THE AI ASSISTANT OBSESSED WITH IMPROVING AND REINVENTING THE CANDIDATE EXPERIENCE, serial 87624772, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
I'M THE AI ASSISTANT OBSESSED WITH IMPROVING AND REINVENTING THE CANDIDATE EXPERIENCESerial 87624772 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Paradox LLC
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Sep 27, 2017
The record shows the application for “I’M THE AI ASSISTANT OBSESSED WITH IMPROVING AND REINVENTING THE CANDIDATE EXPERIENCE” is dead; it was abandoned on Nov 26 2018 because no Statement of Use was filed after the Notice of Allowance, and the owner listed is Paradox LLC, a Delaware limited‑liability company. The goods and services are limited to Class 042, specifically software‑as‑a‑service for data management, analytics, artificial‑intelligence‑driven human‑capital and enterprise‑resource‑planning tools, plus related IT consulting and cloud‑hosting services. A similar name would raise the closest record‑based concern only in that same technology‑and‑software arena; the record does not give the owner control over the wording in unrelated fields. The prosecution history shows the application moved through standard examination, received a Notice of Allowance, and then was abandoned for lack of use, but it never reached the Supplemental Register. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice on Nov 26 2018, and no enforcement actions appear in the file. I'd treat this as a modest concern if you plan to use a comparable phrase for HR‑tech services, but the risk is far lower for other types of goods or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.