Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for EFORMS, serial 87662464, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
EFORMSSerial 87662464 · Supplemental Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Electronic Forms, LLC
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Class 045 - Legal & Personal Services
Filed Oct 27, 2017
Registered Sep 04, 2018
The record shows that the mark “EFORMS” is live and registered on the Supplemental Register under serial 87662464, owned by Electronic Forms, LLC, a Florida limited liability company. The mark covers services in classes 042 and 045, specifically providing online nondownloadable software for lawyers and legal professionals, timekeeping, billing, electronic signature verification, electronic data storage of legal documents, and offering online legal information, customizable legal forms, self‑help, news, and document creation through an interactive website. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the legal‑tech and legal‑services fields, especially where the services overlap with those listed. The prosecution history shows a descriptiveness refusal followed by an amendment to the Supplemental Register, indicating the mark was not accepted on the Principal Register. The latest status event is a Section 8 declaration accepted on September 25, 2024, with the next relevant date being the six‑year renewal deadline in 2030. No enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the record suggests a meaningful concern in legal‑tech and legal‑services contexts.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.