Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for QUARRY SUPPLY, serial 87698143, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
QUARRY SUPPLYSerial 87698143 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Quarry Supply, Inc.
Class 007 -
Filed Nov 27, 2017
The record shows that QUARRY SUPPLY, owned by Quarry Supply, Inc., is an abandoned application on the Principal Register; the USPTO issued an abandonment notice on Dec 4 2019 after the applicant failed to answer the final refusal. The filing covered Class 007 goods – equipment and parts for crushers, conveyors and screening, frapping and fracking applications in material‑handling, mining, recycling and aggregate industries, such as bearings, belt fasteners, gear boxes, motors, pulleys, screens and related electrical controls. A similar name used for any of those specific industrial products would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside that narrow technical field are farther from the scope shown. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the words “quarry” or “supply.” No enforcement actions appear in the history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to brand equipment or parts in the same mining‑related categories, because the abandoned filing still signals a prior claim to that descriptive combination.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.