Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for CULLIGAN WATER, serial 87710095, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
CULLIGAN WATERSerial 87710095 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Culligan International Company
Class 011 -
Filed Dec 06, 2017
Registered Sep 17, 2019
The record shows that “CULLIGAN WATER” is a cancelled Principal Register registration (status dead) owned by Culligan International Company, and it was cancelled on March 27 2026 because the registrant failed to file an acceptable Section 8 declaration. The registration covered Class 011 goods specifically described as water‑softening units, drinking‑water filters, water‑treatment apparatus, and related chemical‑treatment and filtration equipment; a similar name used for any of those types of water‑treatment products would raise the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “water” or over unrelated goods or services. There is no Supplemental Register filing or descriptiveness refusal in the prosecution history. The latest meaningful event is the cancellation for lack of a Section 8 filing, and no further maintenance or renewal dates are listed. The supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations, or court actions, so no enforcement signal appears. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to brand water‑treatment equipment with a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.