Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for FLORES TEMPORIS, serial 87774178, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FLORES TEMPORISSerial 87774178 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Tuma, SeJean
Class 031 -
Class 044 - Medical & Beauty Services
Filed Jan 29, 2018
The record shows that “FLORES TEMPORIS” is an abandoned application – the USPTO marked it dead after the owner, SeJean Tuma, failed to file a required Statement of Use following the Notice of Allowance, with the abandonment notice dated April 8 2019. The filing covered cut flowers (class 031) and flower‑arranging services (class 044), so a later use of a similar name in the floral product or service space would be the closest area of concern; uses outside those categories are farther from the scope shown here. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “flores” or “temporis.” Because the application was on the Principal Register and never moved to the Supplemental Register, there is no supplemental‑register sequence to note. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice on April 8 2019, and no opposition or cancellation actions appear in the history. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan a floral‑related brand, but the risk drops sharply for unrelated goods or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.