Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for DENTRUN, serial 87783457, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
DENTRUNSerial 87783457 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: SUZHOU DANDILIAN TRADING CO.,LTD
Class 028 -
Filed Feb 04, 2018
Registered Oct 02, 2018
The record shows that DENTRUN is a live Principal Register trademark owned by Suzhou Dandilian Trading Co., Ltd, a limited company organized in China, and it has been active since its registration on Oct 02 2018 with a Section 8 declaration accepted on Mar 19 2024. The registration covers a broad list of Class 028 items such as artificial chum for fishing, athletic supporters, various sports equipment (boxing gloves, martial‑arts gear, yoga cushions, gloves for golf, football, etc.), a wide range of toys and play‑related products, and related training apparatus. Because the goods are focused on sports, fitness and toy categories, a new brand using the same or a similar name for products in those areas would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside that scope would be farther from the listed coverage. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the word “DENTRUN.” The prosecution history shows a normal examination and amendment process but no move to the Supplemental Register, so the mark remains on the Principal Register. The latest meaningful event is the acceptance of the Section 8 renewal filing in March 2024, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a similar name for sports‑related or toy products.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.