Status report

Get it in writing

The official USPTO status record for PARTNER OBSESSED, serial 87813021, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.

INSTANT DELIVERY

Trademark Status Report

$7.99

The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.

  • Current status with a plain-English verdict
  • Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
  • The mark as it appears on the federal record
  • Every prosecution event, filing to today
  • Source-cited with the exact retrieval date

Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.

Payments launch soon. Leave your email and we'll tell you when this report is available.

Searching stays free, no account, no caps.

Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PARTNER OBSESSED
Serial 87813021 · Principal Register
Live · Registered

Owner: Insentra Pty Ltd
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Feb 27, 2018
Registered Dec 25, 2018

The record shows that “PARTNER OBSESSED” is a live, registered service mark on the Principal Register, owned by Insentra Pty Ltd, a proprietary limited company organized in Australia. The mark covers a wide range of business‑related services, including business management, consulting, cloud‑computing security promotion, training in computers and IT, and data migration and encryption services, among others. A similar name would raise the closest concern in these business, consulting, and technology‑training areas. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the words “PARTNER” or “OBSESSED” in unrelated contexts. The prosecution history indicates a straightforward acceptance of Sections 8 and 15 declarations, with no descriptiveness refusal or Supplemental Register movement. The most recent status event is the acceptance of the 6‑year Section 8 renewal on May 8, 2025. No oppositions, cancellations, or court actions appear in the supplied history. For someone looking to use a similar name, the risk is that the mark’s broad business‑technology services could create a meaningful concern in those fields.

Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.

The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.

Your name deserves a straight answer.

Search the federal register free. No account, no caps, no waiting around.

Run a free trademark search