Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for TOAD TOTAL ORAL AIRWAY DEVICES, serial 87841565, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
TOAD TOTAL ORAL AIRWAY DEVICESSerial 87841565 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: WM & DG, INC.
Class 010 -
Filed Mar 20, 2018
The record shows that “TOAD TOTAL ORAL AIRWAY DEVICES” is an abandoned application – the USPTO marked it dead on Feb 7 2022 because no Statement of Use or extension was filed after the Notice of Allowance, and the owner listed is WM & DG, INC., a corporation organized in Illinois. The only goods covered are “Medical apparatus with wireless transmittal capability that provides continual visualization, heart, breath sounds and temperature monitoring in real time from internally or externally placed medical devices” in International Class 010, so a similar name used for any other type of product would be farther from the scope shown here, while a name applied to comparable medical monitoring equipment would be the closest area of concern. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the words “TOAD,” “TOTAL,” or “ORAL AIRWAY DEVICES” in unrelated fields. No Supplemental Register filing appears, and the prosecution history simply tracks extensions of time to file a Statement of Use before the final abandonment. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice on Feb 7 2022, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan to market a similar wireless medical monitoring device under a comparable name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.