Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for LOVE OF COUNTRY, serial 87846236, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
LOVE OF COUNTRYSerial 87846236 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Asian Journal Publications, Inc.
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Filed Mar 22, 2018
Registered Oct 30, 2018
The record shows that “LOVE OF COUNTRY” is a cancelled Principal Register service mark owned by Asian Journal Publications, Inc., a California corporation, and it is no longer live as of the May 16 2025 status date when the registration was cancelled for failing to file a required Section 8 declaration. The registration covered only one class—Class 035 advertising and business services—specifically “promoting recreation and tourism in Philippines,” so a similar name used in that same tourism‑promotion context would present the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “love of country” in unrelated fields. Because the mark was never placed on the Supplemental Register, there is no supplemental‑register examination sequence to note. The prosecution history contains no oppositions, cancellations beyond the Section 8 event, or other enforcement actions, so the supplied history shows none. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a tourism‑related advertising service in the Philippines, but the risk fades for unrelated goods or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.