Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for MANGOBRANCH, serial 87883264, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
MANGOBRANCHSerial 87883264 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Brown, Annette
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Apr 18, 2018
The record shows that the mark “MANGOBRANCH” is dead, having been abandoned because the owner, Annette Brown, did not file a Statement of Use or an extension request after the Notice of Allowance was issued. The mark was filed as a service mark on April 18 2018 and was published for opposition on September 11 2018. It covers services in class 042, specifically providing a website that lets computer users upload, exchange, and share photos, videos, and video logs, and a technology platform that enables users to upload and share user‑generated videos on a wide variety of topics. Because the goods and services are narrowly defined around online video sharing, a similar name would raise the closest concern in that same digital‑media space. The record does not give control over every use of the wording; it only reflects the abandoned application. No enforcement actions, oppositions, or cancellations appear in the supplied history. The last meaningful status event was the abandonment on December 9 2019. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status suggests that the mark is no longer enforceable, but the specific services listed still represent a potential area of concern if the new name is used in the same online video‑sharing context.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.