Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for NIKECONNECT, serial 87981770, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
NIKECONNECTSerial 87981770 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Nike, Inc.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 025 - Clothing
Filed Mar 02, 2018
Registered Nov 05, 2019
The record shows that the mark “NIKECONNECT” was registered on the Principal Register on November 5, 2019, but it was cancelled on May 15, 2026 because the owner, Nike, Inc., did not file a required declaration. The cancelled registration covered electrical and scientific apparatus—specifically near‑field communication (NFC) tags, RFID tags, and related mobile‑phone software—and clothing such as jerseys and shirts that incorporate NFC technology. A similar name used for products or services in those exact categories would raise the closest concern. The record does not give Nike control over every use of the wording; it only reflects the goods and services listed. The prosecution history shows a normal sequence of office actions, statements of use, and a divisional filing, but no supplemental register activity. The latest significant event is the cancellation on May 15, 2026, and no enforcement actions are recorded. For someone considering a similar name, the cancelled status reduces the risk, but the specific goods and services listed still present a potential concern if used in the same areas.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.