Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PONY PRINCESS, serial 88022402, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PONY PRINCESSSerial 88022402 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Yiwu BaiBang Jewelry Co., Ltd.
Class 026 -
Filed Jul 02, 2018
The record shows that “PONY PRINCESS” is an abandoned application – the USPTO marked it dead after the applicant failed to answer an Office action, with the abandonment notice dated May 29 2019, and the owner listed as Yiwu BaiBang Jewelry Co., Ltd. The filing covered only International Class 026 and listed goods such as artificial flowers, paper flowers, artificial garlands, pompoms, bird‑feather clothing accessories, bobby pins, hair bows, braids, brooches, decorative backpack charms, embroidery items, false hair, fringes, hair bands, hair slides, lace trimmings and shoe laces. A similar name used for any of those specific items would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated categories fall farther from the scope shown here. Because the mark never entered the register, the record does not give the owner control over every use of the words “PONY PRINCESS.” The prosecution history contains only the non‑final action and the abandonment notice, and no oppositions or cancellations appear, so there’s no visible enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a modest concern if you plan to market comparable decorative or hair‑accessory products under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.