Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for POWER OF TODA(Y)2, serial 88034073, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
POWER OF TODA(Y)2Serial 88034073 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Park, Hyuk Jae
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 021 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Jul 11, 2018
Registered Mar 22, 2022
The record shows a live Principal Register registration (Reg. No. 6674734) owned by Hyuk Jae Park, filed July 11 2018 and registered March 22 2022; the most recent meaningful event is a series of attorney‑withdrawal filings on March 15 2024. The mark “POWER OF TODA(Y)2” covers downloadable and printed electronic books, workbooks and teaching manuals on personal growth, self‑improvement, personal finance, career development, leadership, decision‑making, business networking, public speaking and business management (Class 009 and 016), as well as physical items such as cups, mugs and T‑shirts (Classes 021, 025, 035) and related coaching, training and motivational speaking services (Class 041). A similar name would raise the closest record‑based concern if used for any of those goods or services, especially the educational and coaching offerings. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Power of Toda(y)2” outside these listed scopes. No oppositions, cancellations or court actions appear in the history, so there is no visible enforcement signal. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern for anyone planning a comparable brand in the same educational, publishing or merchandise fields.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.