Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for AVIATION DOCS XR, serial 88037152, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
AVIATION DOCS XRSerial 88037152 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: 2689090 CANADA INC.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Jul 13, 2018
The record shows that the mark “AVIATION DOCS XR” is dead, having been abandoned on June 3 2020 because the applicant failed to respond to an Office action. The owner listed is 2689090 CANADA INC., a corporation organized in Canada. The mark was filed on July 13 2018 under an intent‑to‑use basis and covered a narrow set of goods and services: downloadable and SaaS software for accessing, organizing, and sharing aircraft manuals and aviation‑related documents, including flight plans, checklists, training manuals, legal and regulatory documents, weather information, and safety management guides. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the same software‑as‑a‑service or downloadable application area for aviation documents. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording, only over the specific goods and services listed. The prosecution history shows a series of suspension and abandonment notices, but no opposition or court action. The last meaningful event was the abandonment notice on June 3 2020. For anyone considering a similar name, the abandoned status reduces the risk of conflict, but the specific software‑related services remain a potential point of concern.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.