Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ELSA, serial 88040662, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ELSASerial 88040662 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Elsevier Inc.
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Jul 17, 2018
Registered Mar 31, 2020
The record shows that “ELSA” is a live Principal Register service mark owned by Elsevier Inc., a Delaware corporation, and it has been registered since March 31 2020. The registration covers Class 041 services—electronic desktop publishing for others in the life‑sciences, physical‑sciences, social‑sciences, technology, engineering, business, health and medicine fields—and Class 042 services—platform‑as‑a‑service and software‑as‑a‑service offerings that support word processing, project management, workflow and communication for authors and publishers in those same scientific and technical areas. A similar name used in connection with publishing‑related software platforms or electronic publishing services would be the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside those fields are farther from the scope shown. The record does not give Elsevier control over every possible use of the word “ELSA.” The most recent meaningful event is the acceptance of the combined Section 8 (six‑year renewal) and Section 15 (ownership) declaration on October 3 2025, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a name that touches scientific‑publishing software or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.