Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for HYPHEN-X, serial 88066038, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
HYPHEN-XSerial 88066038 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Dongguan Ruiheng Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed Aug 06, 2018
Registered Mar 19, 2019
The record shows that HYPHEN‑X is a live Principal Register trademark owned by Dongguan Ruiheng Electronic Technology Co., Ltd., and it has been active since its registration on March 19 2019; the most recent meaningful event is the acceptance of a Section 8 declaration on January 16 2025, confirming the mark’s continued use. The registration covers a range of electronic and scientific apparatus in International Class 009, specifically items such as camcorders, CPUs, computer peripherals, earphones, monopods for handheld devices, power adapters, smartglasses, smartphones, video screens, cases, chargers, covers, data cables, couplers, electric cables and conductors, navigational instruments, protective films for smartphones, and rechargeable batteries. Because the goods are all technology‑related, a similar name used for comparable electronic products would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated fields would be farther from the scope shown here. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the word “Hyphen‑X.” No oppositions, cancellations or court actions appear in the history, so there are no visible enforcement signals. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a name in the same tech category.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.