Status report

Get it in writing

The official USPTO status record for LET'S DO THE WORK., serial 88089319, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.

INSTANT DELIVERY

Trademark Status Report

$7.99

The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.

  • Current status with a plain-English verdict
  • Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
  • The mark as it appears on the federal record
  • Every prosecution event, filing to today
  • Source-cited with the exact retrieval date

Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.

Payments launch soon. Leave your email and we'll tell you when this report is available.

Searching stays free, no account, no caps.

Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
LET'S DO THE WORK.
Serial 88089319 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused

Owner: Caterpillar Inc.
Class 007 -
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 012 -
Class 018 -
Class 021 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Class 037 -
Class 039 -
Class 040 -
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Class 044 - Medical & Beauty Services
Filed Aug 23, 2018

The record shows that “LET’S DO THE WORK.” is a dead application that was abandoned on May 10 2021 because no Statement of Use or extension was filed after the Notice of Allowance, and the owner listed is Caterpillar Inc.; it never entered the register. The filing covered a broad range of goods, from motors, engines and machine tools (class 007) and electrical control equipment (class 009) to vehicles and heavy‑equipment (class 012), luggage and bags (class 018), glass and drinkware (class 021), apparel (class 025), financing and insurance services (class 036), repair and maintenance of machinery (class 037), and rentals of vehicles and generators (classes 039 and 040). Because the mark never issued, the record does not give Caterpillar control over every use of the phrase, but a similar name used on products or services that fall within those listed categories would raise the closest record‑based concern. The prosecution history shows the application proceeded through examination, received a Notice of Allowance, and then failed to submit the required use evidence, leading to abandonment; there is no indication of oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use the phrase for any of the listed goods or services.

Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.

The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.

Your name deserves a straight answer.

Search the federal register free. No account, no caps, no waiting around.

Run a free trademark search