Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for EPIC GAMES, serial 88210623, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
EPIC GAMESSerial 88210623 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Epic Games, Inc.
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Class 045 - Legal & Personal Services
Filed Nov 29, 2018
Registered Nov 08, 2022
The record shows that “EPIC GAMES” is a live, Principal Register service mark owned by Epic Games, Inc., a Maryland corporation, and it has been registered since November 8 2022. The registration covers a range of online and communication services tied directly to video‑games and e‑sports, including an on‑line retail store for game software (class 035), internet audio‑video broadcasting and streaming of game‑related content (class 038), entertainment webcasts about games (class 041), customized web pages and data feeds featuring game information (class 042), and an online social‑networking platform for games (class 045). A similar name used in any of those same digital‑gaming contexts would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside those classes are farther from the listed scope but not automatically free of risk. The latest meaningful event is the registration date of November 8 2022; no further maintenance dates are supplied. The prosecution history contains no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions, so the supplied history shows none. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a name that will sit in the same online‑gaming space.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.