Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for FLUFFY, serial 88212377, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FLUFFYSerial 88212377 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Lashify, Inc.
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Filed Nov 30, 2018
Registered Aug 20, 2019
The record shows that “FLUFFY” is a live, registered mark on the Principal Register, owned by Lashify, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It protects the goods “false eyelashes and eyelash extensions” in class 003, with first use on June 20 2019. A similar name used for those same cosmetic products would raise the closest record‑based concern. The mark does not give control over every use of the word “fluffy”; it is limited to the specific goods listed. The prosecution history indicates a standard examination and acceptance of Sections 8 and 15 declarations, with no indication that the mark was ever on the Supplemental Register. The most recent status event is the acceptance of the Section 8 and 15 declarations on October 31 2025, and the next consequential date is the status date of October 31 2025. No enforcement actions, oppositions, or cancellations appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the existing registration presents a meaningful risk if the new use involves false eyelashes or eyelash extensions.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.