Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for MANDY FLORES, serial 88214384, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
MANDY FLORESSerial 88214384 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: FLORES, DAVID
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Dec 03, 2018
Registered Jul 23, 2019
The record shows that the mark MANDY FLORES is cancelled, having been removed from the Principal Register on Feb 6 2026 because the registrant did not file a required Section 8 declaration, and the owner listed is FLORES, DAVID, an individual. The registration covered Class 009 “downloadable video recordings featuring adult fetish content” and Class 041 “entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring non‑downloadable adult‑themed photographs and videos,” so a similar name used for adult‑oriented video or photo services would create the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Mandy Flores” in other industries or contexts. There is no Supplemental Register activity; the mark was granted on the Principal Register in July 2019 and later cancelled after the Section 8 reminder in July 2024. The prosecution history shows no oppositions, cancellations, or court actions, so the supplied history shows no visible enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a brand in the same adult‑content space, but the risk is far lower for unrelated goods or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.