Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PELOTON THERAPEUTICS, serial 88225205, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PELOTON THERAPEUTICSSerial 88225205 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Peloton Therapeutics, Inc.
Class 005 - Pharmaceuticals
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Dec 11, 2018
The record shows that “PELOTON THERAPEUTICS” is a dead, abandoned mark owned by Peloton Therapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation, that was filed on December 11, 2018 and abandoned on February 14, 2022 because no Statement of Use or Extension Request was filed after the Notice of Allowance. The mark was registered on the Principal Register for classes 005 (pharmaceutical preparations for treating various diseases, including cancer, inflammation, metabolic disorders, pulmonary hypertension, and inflammatory bowel disease) and 042 (pharmaceutical research and development services). A similar name would raise the closest concern in the pharmaceutical and research services areas, especially where the goods or services overlap with those listed. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording, and no enforcement activity such as oppositions or cancellations appears in the supplied history. The latest event is the abandonment notice in February 2022. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status reduces the risk of direct conflict, but the specific pharmaceutical scope still represents a potential concern if the new use is in the same or related fields.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.