Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PET OWNER, serial 88282795, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PET OWNERSerial 88282795 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Jiangmen Lvyuan Industrial Products Development Co., Ltd.
Class 021 -
Filed Jan 30, 2019
The record shows that the mark “PET OWNER” is dead, having been abandoned after the applicant failed to respond to an Office action. The owner listed is Jiangmen Lvyuan Industrial Products Development Co., Ltd., a limited company organized in China. The mark was filed on January 30, 2019 and the abandonment was recorded on November 8, 2019. The goods covered were buckets, cages for household pets, cleaning sponges, containers for household or kitchen use, flower pots, flower and plant cultivation trays, ice buckets, litter trays for pets, pet drinking bowls, pet feeding dishes, plates, and sprinklers for watering flowers and plants, all under class 021. Because the mark is dead, it does not grant any control over the wording, but the listed goods represent the closest area of concern for a similar name. The prosecution history shows a standard sequence of notifications and a final abandonment, with no opposition, cancellation, or court action recorded. For someone considering a similar name, the main risk is potential confusion with the abandoned mark’s specific pet‑related goods, though the mark no longer has enforceable rights.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.