Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for CHILLIN' CHOCOLATE DECADENCE, serial 88322009, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
CHILLIN' CHOCOLATE DECADENCESerial 88322009 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Lovin' Scoopful, LLC
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Filed Mar 01, 2019
Registered Sep 24, 2019
The record shows that “CHILLIN’ CHOCOLATE DECADENCE” is a cancelled Principal Register registration (status dead) owned by Lovin’ Scoopful, LLC, and it was cancelled on April 3 2026 because the registrant failed to file a required Section 8 declaration. The registration covered only ice‑cream, ice‑cream desserts and related staple‑food items in International Class 030, so a similar name used for frozen desserts or similar foods would be the closest area of concern. The record does not give the owner any blanket control over the words “CHILLIN’” or “CHOCOLATE DECADENCE” in other product categories or services. There is no Supplemental Register entry, and the prosecution history simply shows the normal examination steps followed by the eventual cancellation for non‑maintenance. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations by a third party, or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use a comparable name for ice‑cream or related desserts.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.