Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for CINDERELLA MOUNTAIN, serial 88366532, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
CINDERELLA MOUNTAINSerial 88366532 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Parton, Dolly
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Apr 01, 2019
The record shows that “CINDERELLA MOUNTAIN” is a dead application that was abandoned on Oct 17 2022 because no Statement of Use or timely extension was filed after the Notice of Allowance, and the owner listed is Dolly Parton as an individual. The filing covered Class 009 (pre‑recorded CDs, DVDs, flash drives and electronic publications featuring music, theater and film content), Class 016 (printed books, magazines, souvenir programs, cookbooks, posters, greeting cards and related paper goods) and Class 041 (live theatrical plays and musicals, production of music, comedy and drama for TV, cable, internet and other media, plus a website and online newsletters about books, theater and movies). A similar name would raise the closest concern in those entertainment‑media and printed‑matter areas, but the record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Cinderella” or “Mountain.” The mark was never placed on the Supplemental Register; it proceeded on the Principal Register until the abandonment. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice on Oct 17 2022, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use a comparable name for music, theater, video or related printed products.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.