Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for EPIC GAMES, serial 88392291, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
EPIC GAMESSerial 88392291 · Principal Register
Pending · Under Examination
Owner: Epic Games, Inc.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Apr 18, 2019
The record shows a pending application for “EPIC GAMES” owned by Epic Games, Inc., a Maryland corporation, and the USPTO lists the status as suspended as of June 3 2026 after a suspension check was completed. The application covers a broad set of virtual‑reality‑related offerings: in class 009 it claims downloadable and recorded VR game software and related computer software; in class 041 it seeks online VR game services, non‑downloadable virtual environments, and virtual goods such as avatars and weapons; and in class 042 it includes hosting, design, development, and programming services for multimedia and virtual‑world platforms. A similar name used for anything in those VR gaming or virtual‑environment spaces would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside that niche are farther from the listed scope. The record does not give Epic Games control over every possible use of the words “Epic” or “Games.” No supplemental‑register activity appears, and the prosecution history is empty, indicating no refusals or amendments. The supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations, or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a name that will sit in the same virtual‑reality gaming or services arena.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.