Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for FLOWERING SYSTEM, serial 88470812, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FLOWERING SYSTEMSerial 88470812 · Supplemental Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Advanced Nutrients Ltd.
Class 001 -
Filed Jun 12, 2019
Registered Apr 28, 2020
The record shows that “FLOWERING SYSTEM” is a live Supplemental Register registration (Reg. No. 6044279) owned by Advanced Nutrients Ltd., a Canadian corporation, and it covers plant nutrients—specifically fertilizers and soil additives—in International Class 001. Because the listed goods are limited to agricultural inputs, the closest area of concern for a similar name would be any other product or service that also supplies fertilizers, soil additives, or related plant‑care items; uses in unrelated fields such as software, clothing, or food would be farther from the scope shown. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “flowering system.” The prosecution history indicates the application was filed on June 12 2019, received a non‑final office action in September 2019, was voluntarily amended in July 2019, and was ultimately approved for Supplemental Register registration on April 28 2020 after an approval entry on March 11 2020. The most recent meaningful event is a courtesy reminder for the Section 8 six‑year filing sent on April 28 2025, showing the registration is still active. No oppositions, cancellations or court actions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market fertilizers or soil additives under a similar name, but the risk is lower for unrelated product categories.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.