Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ANDROID JETPACK, serial 88521393, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ANDROID JETPACKSerial 88521393 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Google LLC
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Jul 18, 2019
Registered Jan 21, 2020
The record shows that “ANDROID JETPACK” is a live Principal Register service mark owned by Google LLC, a Delaware limited‑liability company, and it has been active since its registration on Jan 21 2020. The filing covers Class 042 services – specifically an application service provider offering API software, SaaS, and compiler, debugger and utility programs for designing, developing and testing mobile software applications. A similar name used for any kind of mobile‑app development platform or related cloud‑based tooling would raise the closest record‑based concern because the listed services directly target that technical niche. The USPTO entry does not give Google control over every possible use of the words “android” or “jetpack” in unrelated fields; it only protects the exact combination in the described tech services. The most recent meaningful event is the acceptance of a combined Section 8 (six‑year renewal) and Section 15 (ownership) declaration on Apr 1 2026, confirming the mark’s continued validity. The prosecution history contains no oppositions, cancellations or court actions, so the supplied history shows no enforcement signals. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to brand a mobile‑app development service with a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.