Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for NEW ROTIKAA MADE IN AMERICA FOR HEALTHYLIVING & HOMEMADE TASTE FRESH HOMEMADE TASTE!, serial 88586358, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
NEW ROTIKAA MADE IN AMERICA FOR HEALTHYLIVING & HOMEMADE TASTE FRESH HOMEMADE TASTE!Serial 88586358 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: New Rotikaa Foods, LLC
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Filed Aug 21, 2019
Registered Jul 28, 2020
The record shows a live, registered Principal Register mark owned by New Rotikaa Foods, LLC, a New Jersey limited‑liability company, and it covers “roti bread; multigrain roti bread; whole wheat roti bread” in International Class 030 (staple foods). Because the listed goods are specific types of bread, a similar name used for other food categories—say snacks, beverages, or non‑food products—would be farther from the scope shown here, while another bakery or roti product using a comparable phrase would present the closest record‑based concern. The registration does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “NEW ROTIKAA” or the descriptive phrases in the disclaimer. The prosecution history shows an examiner’s amendment on March 28 2020 followed by registration on the Principal Register on July 28 2020, indicating the mark cleared any descriptiveness issues before being granted. The most recent status event is a Section 8 courtesy reminder mailed on July 28 2025, confirming the registration is still active, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market roti‑type breads under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.