Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for IDACTION, serial 88611512, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
IDACTIONSerial 88611512 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: ID R&D, Inc.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Sep 10, 2019
The record shows that IDACTION, owned by ID R&D, Inc., is an abandoned application – the USPTO marked it dead after the applicant failed to respond to an Office action, with the abandonment notice dated June 30 2020. The filing covered Class 009 computer software described as downloadable security software using behavioral biometrics, and Class 042 IT security services that use behavioral biometric data and security‑software development, both first used on July 21 2019. Because the goods and services are focused on security‑related software and services, a similar name used in the same technological or biometric‑security space would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated fields would be farther from the scope shown here. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the word “IDACTION.” No Supplemental Register filing appears, and the latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice on June 30 2020; no enforcement actions are visible in the history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a name in the security‑software arena.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.