Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for W WILTON 4 - PIECE TOASTER OVEN BAKEWARE SET JUEGO DE UTENSILIOS PARA HORNEAR ENSEMBLE DE ARTICLES DE CUISSON, serial 88630188, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
W WILTON 4 - PIECE TOASTER OVEN BAKEWARE SET JUEGO DE UTENSILIOS PARA HORNEAR ENSEMBLE DE ARTICLES DE CUISSONSerial 88630188 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Wilton Industries, Inc.
Class 021 -
Filed Sep 25, 2019
The record shows that the application for “W WILTON 4 – PIECE TOASTER OVEN BAKEWARE SET JUEGO DE UTENSILIOS PARA HORNEAR ENSEMBLE DE ARTICLES DE CUISSON” was filed by Wilton Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation, on September 25 2019, but it was abandoned on July 17 2020 after the applicant failed to respond to an Office action. The goods listed fall in International Class 021 and cover a long list of bakeware and kitchen tools such as cooking forks, serving spoons, tongs, mashers, pie servers, mixing bowls, pastry brushes and manually operated dough blenders, among many others. Because the record is limited to those kitchen‑related items, a similar name used for unrelated products—say, clothing or software—would be farther from the scope shown here, though the wording itself is not cleared for all uses. The prosecution history shows a non‑final action was issued on December 30 2019 and the applicant never answered, leading to the abandonment notice on July 17 2020; no enforcement actions or oppositions appear in the file. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market bakeware or similar kitchen gadgets under a comparable name, since the abandoned filing still signals that the owner once sought protection in that category.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.