Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for LAUREL CHANNEL, serial 88632048, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
LAUREL CHANNELSerial 88632048 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Red Zeppelin Productions, L.L.C.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Sep 26, 2019
Registered May 05, 2020
The record shows that “LAUREL CHANNEL” is a live, Principal Register trademark owned by Red Zeppelin Productions, L.L.C., a limited‑liability company organized in the District of Columbia. It covers downloadable films and movies offered through a video‑on‑demand service (class 009), an online retail store for downloadable and pre‑recorded music and movies (class 035), video streaming of independent films (class 038), and a suite of entertainment‑related services such as online reviews, multimedia publishing, and production and distribution of television shows and movies (class 041). A similar name used in any of those digital‑media or entertainment contexts would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside those classes are farther from the scope shown. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Laurel” or “Channel.” The latest meaningful event is a Section 8 six‑year maintenance reminder dated May 5 2025; no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions appear in the history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a comparable brand in the same online‑media space.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.