Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for FULL MOON PRODUCTIONS, serial 88641540, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FULL MOON PRODUCTIONSSerial 88641540 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Full Moon Productions, Inc.
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 025 - Clothing
Filed Oct 03, 2019
The record shows that “FULL MOON PRODUCTIONS” is a dead mark owned by Full Moon Productions, Inc., a corporation organized in Missouri, and it was abandoned on August 30, 2021 because the applicant failed to respond to an Office action. The mark was filed on October 3, 2019 under an intent‑to‑use basis and was registered on the Principal Register for classes 016 and 025. Class 016 covers paper goods and printed matter such as decorative door cut‑outs, 3‑D glasses, paper plates, paper cups, paper bowls, stationery, brochures, journals, newsletters, posters, decals, merchandise bags, stickers, novelty identification cards, gift boxes, journals, bookmarks, buttons, history books and photo albums. Class 025 covers a wide range of apparel, including hats, gloves, underwear, scarves, aprons, baby onesies, socks, lounge wear, tops, shorts, pants, sweatshirts, sweatpants, sweaters, jackets, leather jackets, jean jackets, headwear, and footwear. Because the mark is dead, it no longer provides protection, but the record still shows that a similar name could raise the closest concern for goods in those two classes. No enforcement actions or oppositions are visible in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the main risk is that the abandoned mark’s description of paper goods and apparel could still be cited as a prior use in those specific product categories.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.