Status report

Get it in writing

The official USPTO status record for THE NAME OF THE BRAND IS ALL IN LOWER CASE AND WITH THE APOSTROPHE INCLUDED: C'MON BRAH THE CURRENT LOGO USES THESE TWO WORD COMBINED WRITTEN WITH THE FONT OF LATO. ABOVE IT, IS THE OUTLINE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND A DOLLAR SIGN UNITED TO THE STATE BY AN ARROW POINTING TOWARD THE THE STATE OUTLINE., serial 88666248, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.

INSTANT DELIVERY

Trademark Status Report

$7.99

The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.

  • Current status with a plain-English verdict
  • Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
  • The mark as it appears on the federal record
  • Every prosecution event, filing to today
  • Source-cited with the exact retrieval date

Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.

Payments launch soon. Leave your email and we'll tell you when this report is available.

Searching stays free, no account, no caps.

Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
THE NAME OF THE BRAND IS ALL IN LOWER CASE AND WITH THE APOSTROPHE INCLUDED: C'MON BRAH THE CURRENT LOGO USES THESE TWO WORD COMBINED WRITTEN WITH THE FONT OF LATO. ABOVE IT, IS THE OUTLINE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND A DOLLAR SIGN UNITED TO THE STATE BY AN ARROW POINTING TOWARD THE THE STATE OUTLINE.
Serial 88666248 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused

Owner: Sean Pond
Class 025 - Clothing
Filed

The record shows a dead application that was refused on Oct 30 2019 because the filing did not meet the minimum filing‑date requirements, and the serial number was assigned in error; the owner listed is Sean Pond, a joint venture organized in Alabama. The only goods covered are clothing items—shirts, shirts for suits, A‑shirts, body shirts, sports shirts, sweat shirts, T‑shirts, and tee shirts—so a similar name used for apparel would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated categories would be farther from this filing’s scope. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording, only over the listed clothing goods. The prosecution history simply notes the entry of a new intent‑to‑use application and its subsequent refusal; there are no oppositions, cancellations, or other enforcement actions shown. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market clothing under a comparable name.

Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.

The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.

Your name deserves a straight answer.

Search the federal register free. No account, no caps, no waiting around.

Run a free trademark search