Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for GET IN IT - GET ON IT - GET IN ON IT, serial 88786818, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
GET IN IT - GET ON IT - GET IN ON ITSerial 88786818 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: HONER, JODI
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Feb 06, 2020
The record shows that the mark “GET IN IT – GET ON IT – GET IN ON IT” is a dead service mark owned by JODI HONER, an individual. The mark was filed on February 6, 2020 and was abandoned on May 2, 2022 because the owner never filed a Statement of Use or an Extension Request after the Notice of Allowance on September 28, 2021. The goods and services listed cover a wide range of entertainment services, primarily ongoing IPTV, streaming television, and interactive television programs such as game shows, talk shows, and interview shows broadcast over the Internet, television, satellite, audio, video, virtual, social and digital media, and telecommunications networks. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the field of interactive entertainment and streaming television services. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording; it only reflects the specific services listed. No enforcement activity—oppositions, cancellations, or court actions—is visible in the supplied history. The last significant event was the abandonment notice on May 2, 2022. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status means the mark is not currently enforceable, but the detailed entertainment services listed could still pose a risk if the new name is used in a closely related field.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.