Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for VETERANS IN PAIN, (V.I.P), serial 88789534, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
VETERANS IN PAIN, (V.I.P)Serial 88789534 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Veterans In Pain
Class 044 - Medical & Beauty Services
Filed Feb 07, 2020
The record shows that “VETERANS IN PAIN, (V.I.P.)” is an abandoned application – the USPTO marked it dead on Nov 17 2020 after the applicant failed to answer a non‑final office action, and no later response was filed. The owner listed is Veterans In Pain, a California‑based nonprofit that filed the mark on Feb 7 2020 on the Principal Register for services in International Class 044, specifically medical and beauty services that connect veterans with regenerative‑medicine providers and related nonprofit activities. Because the filing covers only those medical‑service offerings, a similar name used for unrelated goods—say, apparel or food—would be farther from the scope shown here, though the wording itself is not cleared for all uses. The prosecution history contains only the office‑action notices and the abandonment notice; there are no oppositions, cancellations or court actions recorded. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a comparable name in the same veteran‑focused medical‑service field.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.