Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for NOVALYTICS, serial 88816778, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
NOVALYTICSSerial 88816778 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Boston Health Economics, LLC
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Mar 02, 2020
The record shows that the mark “NOVALYTICS” is dead, having been abandoned because the owner, Boston Health Economics, LLC, did not file a Statement of Use or Extension Request after the Notice of Allowance. The mark was a service mark on the Principal Register, filed on March 2, 2020, and published for opposition on June 23, 2020. The goods and services listed under class 042 cover the temporary use of web‑based software for managing, accessing, analyzing, and sharing information and data in the healthcare and life sciences industries, including real‑world evidence, health economics, outcomes research, epidemiological studies, payer research, and market access, as well as predictive analytics in those fields. Because the record is limited to that specific class and scope, a similar name used for unrelated goods or services would be farther from the exact concern, but the record still shows a close risk for software services in healthcare. No enforcement actions, oppositions, or cancellations appear in the supplied history. For anyone considering a similar name in the same software‑healthcare niche, this history suggests a meaningful concern.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.