Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PULP AND PAPERWORKERS' RESOURCE COUNCIL EST. 1991, serial 88842372, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PULP AND PAPERWORKERS' RESOURCE COUNCIL EST. 1991Serial 88842372 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: PULP & PAPERWORKER'S RESOURCE COUNCIL, INC
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Filed Mar 20, 2020
Registered Jun 29, 2021
The record shows a live, Principal Register service mark owned by PULP & PAPERWORKER'S RESOURCE COUNCIL, INC, a non‑profit corporation organized in Arkansas, and the mark “PULP AND PAPERWORKERS' RESOURCE COUNCIL EST. 1991” is currently registered. The registration covers class 035 services described as “promoting public awareness as to the importance of industries that produce forest products and the vital role that those industries play in the lives of their employees and to the economies of the mainly small rural cities and towns where particular mills are located.” A similar name used in advertising, public‑awareness or business‑promotion activities for forest‑product industries would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside that scope are farther from the listed area. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the wording. The latest meaningful event is a courtesy reminder for a Section 8 filing dated June 29 2026, confirming the registration is still active. The supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a comparable name in the same promotional context.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.