Status report

Get it in writing

The official USPTO status record for ONEPLUS NORD, serial 88849004, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.

INSTANT DELIVERY

Trademark Status Report

$7.99

The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.

  • Current status with a plain-English verdict
  • Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
  • The mark as it appears on the federal record
  • Every prosecution event, filing to today
  • Source-cited with the exact retrieval date

Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.

Payments launch soon. Leave your email and we'll tell you when this report is available.

Searching stays free, no account, no caps.

Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ONEPLUS NORD
Serial 88849004 · Principal Register
Live · Registered

Owner: OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Mar 26, 2020
Registered Mar 29, 2022

The record shows that ONEPLUS NORD is a live, Principal Register service mark owned by OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., a limited company organized in China, and it was registered on March 29 2022 after filing on March 26 2020. The registration covers advertising and business services (class 035) such as online advertising, rental of advertising time, an online marketplace, and vending‑machine rentals, as well as scientific and technology services (class 042) including industrial and packaging design and weather forecasting. A similar name used in those same advertising, marketplace or design contexts would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside those listed services are farther from the scope shown. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “ONEPLUS NORD.” The latest meaningful event is the registration on March 29 2022; no further maintenance dates are provided, and the prosecution history shows no oppositions or cancellations, so the supplied history shows no enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a brand that offers advertising, online marketplace or design services under a similar name.

Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.

The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.

Your name deserves a straight answer.

Search the federal register free. No account, no caps, no waiting around.

Run a free trademark search