Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for CHILLIN' ORANGE, serial 88876599, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
CHILLIN' ORANGESerial 88876599 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Colgate-Palmolive Company
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Filed Apr 17, 2020
The record shows that “CHILLIN’ ORANGE” is an abandoned application (status “dead”) filed by Colgate‑Palmolive Company, a Delaware corporation, and it never entered registration because no Statement of Use was filed after the Notice of Allowance on August 25 2020; the abandonment notice was issued on March 29 2021. The only goods listed are “Skin cleansers” in International Class 3, so a similar name used for cosmetics or cleaning products would be the closest area of concern, while uses in unrelated categories such as food, apparel or software would fall farther from the scope shown here. The record does not give Colgate‑Palmolive control over every possible use of the words “CHILLIN’” or “ORANGE.” No Supplemental Register filing appears, and the prosecution history simply reflects the standard steps of publication, allowance, and the later abandonment for lack of use. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations or court actions, so there is no visible enforcement signal. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan a skin‑care product with a similar name, but the risk is limited to the narrow “skin cleansers” field.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.