Status report

Get it in writing

The official USPTO status record for NEW ROTIKAA MADE IN AMERICA FOR HEALTHYLIVING & HOMEMADE TASTE FRESH HOMEMADE TASTE! MULTIGRAIN ROTI NO ARTIFICIAL COLORS, FLAVORS OR PRESERVATIVES, serial 88957070, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.

INSTANT DELIVERY

Trademark Status Report

$7.99

The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.

  • Current status with a plain-English verdict
  • Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
  • The mark as it appears on the federal record
  • Every prosecution event, filing to today
  • Source-cited with the exact retrieval date

Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.

Payments launch soon. Leave your email and we'll tell you when this report is available.

Searching stays free, no account, no caps.

Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
NEW ROTIKAA MADE IN AMERICA FOR HEALTHYLIVING & HOMEMADE TASTE FRESH HOMEMADE TASTE! MULTIGRAIN ROTI NO ARTIFICIAL COLORS, FLAVORS OR PRESERVATIVES
Serial 88957070 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused

Owner: New Rotikaa Foods, LLC
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Filed

The record shows the application for “NEW ROTIKAA MADE IN AMERICA FOR HEALTHYLIVING & HOMEMADE TASTE FRESH HOMEMADE TASTE! MULTIGRAIN ROTI NO ARTIFICIAL COLORS, FLAVORS OR PRESERVATIVES” is dead; it was refused and dismissed on July 7, 2020 because the USPTO determined the serial number was assigned in error and the filing did not meet the minimum filing‑date requirements. The owner listed is New Rotikaa Foods, LLC, a New Jersey limited‑liability company, and the only goods covered are roti bread, multigrain roti bread and whole wheat roti bread in class 030. A similar name used for any type of roti or related staple food would be the closest area of concern, but the record does not give the owner control over other products or broader uses of the wording. The prosecution history contains only a “new application entered” entry on June 13, 2020, followed by the refusal; no oppositions, cancellations or court actions appear. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market a roti‑type product under a comparable name.

Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.

The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.

Your name deserves a straight answer.

Search the federal register free. No account, no caps, no waiting around.

Run a free trademark search