Status report

Get it in writing

The official USPTO status record for ONEPLUS NORD, serial 88983362, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.

INSTANT DELIVERY

Trademark Status Report

$7.99

The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.

  • Current status with a plain-English verdict
  • Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
  • The mark as it appears on the federal record
  • Every prosecution event, filing to today
  • Source-cited with the exact retrieval date

Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.

Payments launch soon. Leave your email and we'll tell you when this report is available.

Searching stays free, no account, no caps.

Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ONEPLUS NORD
Serial 88983362 · Principal Register
Live · Registered

Owner: OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed Mar 26, 2020
Registered Apr 26, 2022

The record shows that ONEPLUS NORD is a live, Principal Register trademark owned by OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., a limited company organized in China, and it was registered on April 26 2022 after filing on March 26 2020. The registration covers Class 009 goods – tablet computers, smartphones, laptop sleeves, mobile‑phone loudspeakers and headphones, e‑readers, smart televisions, remote controls (excluding gaming apparatus), electrical adapters, battery chargers, mobile telephone batteries, internet‑ready TVs, smartwatches and related accessories, with a first use in commerce dated July 21 2020. A similar name used for any of those electronic devices would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside that narrow list fall farther from the scope shown here, though the record does not control every possible use of the wording. The latest meaningful event is the registration itself on April 26 2022; no further maintenance dates are supplied. The prosecution history contains only routine office‑action correspondence and a statement‑of‑use filing, and the supplied history shows no enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to brand electronic hardware or accessories similar to the listed items.

Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.

The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.

Your name deserves a straight answer.

Search the federal register free. No account, no caps, no waiting around.

Run a free trademark search