Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ONEPLUS, serial 88985013, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ONEPLUSSerial 88985013 · Principal Register
Pending · Opposition Pending
Owner: OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Dec 10, 2019
The record shows a live, pending application for the mark ONEPLUS owned by OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., filed on Dec 10 2019 and currently in opposition after publication, with the most recent status update on Oct 06 2020 when an opposition was instituted. The goods and services listed fall in classes 009, 035 and 042 and focus on electronic devices such as smartphones, tablets, smartwatches, smart televisions and related accessories, plus advertising, market‑research, online marketplace and various technology‑service offerings like cloud‑computing consulting and data‑backup. A similar name used for those kinds of hardware or tech‑service products would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside those categories are farther from the scope shown here. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the word ONEPLUS, and it is not on the Supplemental Register, so no supplemental‑register sequence appears. The supplied history contains no visible enforcement actions such as oppositions or cancellations beyond the pending opposition. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a name that overlaps the listed tech and advertising services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.