Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ONE +, serial 88985015, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ONE +Serial 88985015 · Principal Register
Pending · Opposition Pending
Owner: OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Dec 10, 2019
The record shows a live, pending application for the mark ONE + owned by OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., filed on Dec 10 2019 and currently listed as “Opposition Pending” after an opposition was instituted on Oct 5 2020. The goods and services are confined to Class 009 items such as smartphones, tablets, smartwatches and related electronic devices, Class 035 advertising and online marketplace services, and Class 042 technology‑related research, design and cloud‑computing consulting. Because the filing covers those specific electronic‑goods and tech‑service categories, a similar name used for comparable products would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated fields would be farther from the scope shown. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “ONE +.” The latest meaningful event is the opposition instituted on Oct 5 2020; no enforcement actions beyond that appear in the history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a name in the same tech‑device space.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.