Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for WORLD VS. COVID -19 HAND MOISTURIZING SANITIZER KILLS 99.9% OF VIRUS AND BACTERIA IPA 80%, DI WATER, HYDROGEN PEROXIDE 35%, GLYCERIN, OIL FRG [email protected] 250 ML, serial 90023198, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
WORLD VS. COVID -19 HAND MOISTURIZING SANITIZER KILLS 99.9% OF VIRUS AND BACTERIA IPA 80%, DI WATER, HYDROGEN PEROXIDE 35%, GLYCERIN, OIL FRG [email protected] 250 MLSerial 90023198 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: HOUSE OF JENNIFER
Class 005 - Pharmaceuticals
Filed
The record shows that the mark “WORLD VS. COVID -19 HAND MOISTURIZING SANITIZER KILLS 99.9% OF VIRUS AND BACTERIA IPA 80%, DI WATER, HYDROGEN PEROXIDE 35%, GLYCERIN, OIL FRG [email protected] 250 ML” is dead and was refused because it did not meet minimum filing date requirements. The owner listed is HOUSE OF JENNIFER, a Michigan corporation. The goods described are kits that include sanitizer gel, disinfecting wipes, sanitary masks, plastic gloves and hand cream used for germ prevention, all under class 005. A similar name that references hand sanitizers or germ‑prevention products would raise the closest concern, while unrelated goods would be farther from the scope shown. The record does not give control over every use of the wording. No enforcement activity appears in the supplied history. The last status event was the refusal on July 24, 2020. For anyone considering a similar name, the record suggests a meaningful concern if the name is used for similar germ‑prevention products.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.